FiltersDone

Question type

Essay

Multiple Choice

Short Answer

True False

Matching

Exam 20: Corporations: Distributions in Complete Liquidation and an Overview of Reorganizations

Show Answer

Share

---

All types

Filters

Study FlashcardsPractice ExamLearn

Question 21

True/False

Review LaterAdd Note

Review Later

Section 332 can apply to a parent-subsidiary liquidation even if the subsidiary corporation is insolvent on the date of the liquidation.

A) True
B) False

Correct Answer

verified

Show Answer

Question 22

True/False

Review LaterAdd Note

Review Later

Individual shareholders would prefer to have a gain on a corporate reorganization treated as a capital gain rather than as a dividend, because they can reduce the amount taxable by their basis in the stock involved.

A) True
B) False

Correct Answer

verified

Show Answer

Question 23

True/False

Review LaterAdd Note

The Federal income tax treatment of a corporate restructuring is an extension of allowing entities to form without taxation.

Sparrow Corporation purchased 90% of the stock of Warbler Corporation eight years ago for $1 million. In the current year, Sparrow liquidates Warbler and acquires assets with a basis to Warbler of $850,000 (fair market value of $1.2 million). Sparrow will have a basis in the assets of $850,000 (Warbler's basis in the assets), and no recognized gain or loss.

Ruby Corporation has announced plans to liquidate. Bronze Corporation owns 85% of Ruby's stock. If Bronze wants to avoid the nontaxable treatment associated with a § 332 liquidation (e.g., nonrecognition of loss), it could reduce its stock ownership in Ruby to below 80%.

For a corporate restructuring to qualify as a tax-free reorganization, the step transaction doctrine must apply.

A shareholder bought 10,000 shares of Coral Corporation for $50,000 several years ago. When the stock is valued at $90,000, Coral redeems the shares in exchange for 5,000 shares of Blush Corporation stock and a $10,000 Blush bond. This transaction meets the requirements of § 368. Which of the following statements is false regarding this transaction?

One similarity between the tax treatment accorded liquidating and nonliquidating distributions is with respect to a shareholder's basis in property received in such distributions. For each type of distribution, the shareholder's basis is the property's fair market value on the date of distribution.

Obtaining a favorable letter ruling from the IRS can ensure the desired tax treatment for parties contemplating a corporate reorganization.

Purple Corporation has two equal shareholders, Joshua and Ellie, who are father and daughter. One year ago, the two shareholders transferred properties to Purple in a § 351 exchange. Joshua transferred land (basis of $600,000, fair market value of $450,000) and securities (basis of $70,000, fair market value of $250,000) , and Ellie transferred equipment (basis of $420,000, fair market value of $700,000) . In the current year, Purple Corporation adopts a plan of liquidation, sells all of its assets, and distributes the proceeds pro rata to Joshua and Ellie. The only loss realized upon disposition of the properties was with respect to the land that had decreased in value to $310,000 and was sold for this amount. Purple never used the land for any business purpose during the time it was owned by the corporation. What amount of loss can Purple Corporation recognize on the sale of the land?

If a liquidation qualifies under § 332, any minority shareholder will recognize gain or loss equal to the difference between the fair market value of assets received and the basis of the shareholder's stock.

Brown Corporation purchased 85% of the stock of Green Corporation five years ago for $850,000. In the current year, Brown Corporation liquidates Green Corporation and acquires assets with a basis to Green Corporation of $700,000 (fair market value of $1.1 million). Brown Corporation will have a basis in the assets of $850,000, the same as Brown's basis in its Green stock.

In the current year, Dove Corporation (E & P of $1 million) distributes all of its property in a complete liquidation. Alexandra, a shareholder, receives land having a fair market value of $200,000. Dove Corporation had purchased the land as an investment three years ago for $125,000, and the land was distributed subject to a $100,000 liability. Alexandra took the land subject to the $100,000 liability. What is her basis in the land?

The gains that shareholders recognize as a part of a corporate reorganization may be treated a dividend to the extent of the corporation's E & P.

The related-party loss limitation in a complete liquidation applies only to distributions of property while the built-in loss limitation can apply to a distribution or sale of property.

Which of the following statements is true?

Skylark Corporation owned 100% of the outstanding stock of Quail Corporation having purchased the stock six years ago for $200,000. Pursuant to a plan of liquidation adopted by Quail Corporation earlier in the current year, Quail distributed all its property to its shareholder. Quail Corporation had never been insolvent and had E & P of $700,000 on the date of liquidation. Pursuant to the liquidation, Quail distributes property worth $650,000 (basis $340,000) to Skylark Corporation. How much gain must the parties recognize on the transfer of this property to Skylark?

What will cause the corporations involved in a § 368 reorganization to recognize gain or loss? What will cause shareholders of the companies involved in the corporate reorganization to recognize gain or loss? If gain is recognized by shareholders, what are the different tax character possibilities?

Explain whether shareholders are exempted from gain/loss recognition in nontaxable corporate reorganization or the gain/loss recognition is merely postponed. If postponed, what is the vehicle for ensuring the postponed gain/loss will be recognized in the future?

Bobcat Corporation redeems all of Zed's 4,000 shares and distributes to him 2,000 shares of Van Corporation stock plus $50,000 cash. Zed's basis in his 20% interest in Bobcat is $100,000 and the stock's value is $250,000. At the time Bobcat is acquired by Van, the accumulated earnings and profits of Bobcat are $200,000 and of Van are $75,000. How does Zed treat this transaction for tax purposes?